V. Good

Oct. 9th, 2009 12:05 pm
julieandrews: (Default)
[personal profile] julieandrews
I read a very good short story yesterday called "Jo's Hair" by Susan Palwick. Found it in New Magics, an anthology edited by Patrick Nielsen Hayden.

Not sure why it struck me particularly, especially as I'm told I haven't even read the full version of Little Women. But it did strike me enough that I wanted to tell people, and have a record of it.

So, there you are.

And you know what? You know what? That wasn't even a freaking fantasy or science fiction story now that I think about it. What the frell?!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-10-09 10:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shweta-narayan.livejournal.com
I love that story.

And it's certainly speculative given the POV :) I think it belongs to the thread of feminist SF that speculates by pulling apart reader-presuppositions and turning around something the reader knows and has accepted, rather than using overtly skiffy tropes. (So like, KJF's What We Didn't Seee, Emshwiller's recent Strange Horizons story, etc)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-10-13 04:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] julieandrews.livejournal.com
Karen's plays on a known sf story though...

Haven't read the Emshwiller story. I need to read Strange Horizons more regularly.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-10-13 10:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shweta-narayan.livejournal.com
The Emshwiller plays on a known SF trope. The Palwick's playing on a non-spec story, but in a way you could not in a non-spec story (the POV). All of them do so with feminist sensibilities.

Profile

julieandrews: (Default)
julieandrews

May 2014

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627 28293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags