julieandrews: (Default)
A shout out to Megan McArdle for the inspiration.

I'm a firm believer that everyone should read and watch science fiction. Not only is there a lot of cool stuff people will be missing out on if they don't, but my future sales depend on it.

That said, we all know how hard it is to turn guys onto science fiction. They'd rather watch a game of football or tinker with the inner workings of their car. And when they do pick up a book, they'd prefer to read about how to get ahead at the office.

This can be quite frustrating for any science fiction fan who has to live with them. So for all you girlfriends, sisters, daughters, and bffs out there, here's some tips on how to introduce a guy to science fiction. And hopefully get them permanently hooked.

You've probably tried in the past. Left a copy of The Left Hand of Darkness lying around for him to find. Dragged him to the midnight showing of "Serenity", all the while explaining how it's the perfect date movie and assuring him there would be other guys in the audience.

No doubt you've tried to explain your fascination for science fiction in the following manner: "Character development!" "Continuing plot!" "Angsty backstory!" Instead, why not try equating science fiction to an adventure story. Only an adventure story with three-dimensional characters. The basic feel of it is the same.

I also advocate easing a guy into science fiction. Start with something with a little heavier on the action and a little lighter on the characterization. Maybe Michael Crichton instead of Lois McMaster Bujold. When it comes to television, start him off with the X-Files, then maybe Deep Space Nine or Babylon Five and slowly work your way up to Doctor Who. I caution you to be very certain he can handle it before you introduce him to Quantum Leap. For movies, Godzilla instead of E. T. You get the idea.

That said, I have no particular expertise in this area. These are just some of my ideas. If there are tricks that have worked for you in the past, or you'd just like to share your frustration of living with a guy who Just Doesn't Get It (tm), please leave a comment.
julieandrews: (Default)
I'm going to link to io9 again, because, dude, "Science Fiction That Could Turn You Queer".

It's a mix of movies, television series, books, and comics, so there's something for everyone. Not only do I agree with some of their choices, but I like the descriptions they've written. And now I have some more things to check out.

Plus, their lead picture is Captain Jack and Spike, so... no, not that Captain Jack, and not actually Spike, but I'm sure there's a crossover fanfic or two out there if that's what you're looking for.

There's an Octavia Butler book on the list, which I actually own, and have not read. Need to remedy that.

Update: Beware Spoilers. If there's something on the list you're in the middle of reading or the middle of watching or intend to read or intend to watch, probably best to skip over that description and move on.
julieandrews: (Default)
The Feminist SF blog had a recent post about the trailer for Wall-E and the apparently straight robots. You can see that post and the comments.

And today I found that io9 is running a poll on Who is the Gayest Robot in Science Fiction?. It's a whole lot of fluff and obviously not meant to be taken seriously, but here I am getting a bit serious with it anyhow.

How do you define gay when it comes to robots?

- First they're going to need a sex. Or at a least a gender.

Technically all robots should be biologically neuter, since they have no biology. So thus, no gay robots. But that would be a non-starter, so let's assume a gender is enough.

Do they have to be androids and thus be in human form with appropriate equipment and preferably 'fully functional'? Or is it enough to have secondary sexual characteristics such as a masculine or feminine voice or plastic facial hair? Or is it yet enough for them to wheel around on pink treads or carry advertisements for Old Spice? Or maybe it all comes down to the names and pronouns they're given by humans.

- So assuming you have a male robot, however you define male, or a female robot, however you define female, what would make one gay?

ExpandClick here for gay robots. )

Anyone up for publishing a gay robot anthology?
julieandrews: (Default)
Now that I'm back from Wiscon and from gallivanting with my parents, I had time to finish reading the July 2008 issue of Fantasy & Science Fiction which I, in full disclosure, received for free upon the promise to blog about it.

The first thing I noticed was that there was one woman's name on the cover out of five authors. Would I have noticed this before the blogosphere brouhaha of yesteryear? Probably not consciously, but certainly subconsciously. Turning to the table of contents, Lisa Goldstein is the only female name on the six stories. Naturally this doesn't mean she is a woman, or that the other five are not. But chances are. It also doesn't mean much that she made the cover, since only Scott Dalrymple did not. This is his first published story, so you can see why his name on the cover isn't likely to sell any additional copies. But hey, he works at Hartwick College, which my father went to.

More annoyingly, all of the stories have male main characters. Can I fault this without being hypocritical? I tend to mostly write guys. Yes, I can, because that means the guys should've been writing mostly chicks. See?

I like to read science fiction/fantasy magazines and anthologies from cover to cover. Except when I get impatient and skip to the shorter stories. I try not to do this, since it's kind of nice to save them for a good refresher after slogging through the long ones just before them. For this issue, I read it cover to cover except that I skipped over the novella, and I didn't read the movie reviews.

ExpandI discuss the contents in more detail behind this cut. I try not to be too spoily. )

As for the cover, supposedly it's for the novella. But other than it being a futuristic building of some sort, I can't quite see what it has to do with the story.

Anyway, if you'd like to pick up this issue, it should be on newstands/bookstores/magazine racks/whatever throughout June.

And if you'd like to subscribe, there's a limited time good deal on subscriptions available here: https://www.toybox.ca/fsf/blog-buy-sub.htm and PayPal here: http://www.sfsite.com/fsf/blog-subscribe.htm

Go forth and support science fiction and fantasy!
julieandrews: (Default)
Found this article over at the New York Times: At Sci Fi Channel, the Universe Is Expanding and the Future Is Now

Yea, the title doesn't say much. But the article says some very interesting things:

[...]the network has expanded its audience, especially among women, chiefly by stretching the definition of science fiction.
[...]
“It’s not just aliens, spaceships and the future,” said Dave Howe, who was promoted to president of Sci Fi from general manager in January. “It’s about asking that simple question, ‘What if?’ ”

The changes evolved over several years. One result is a widening audience, especially among women. In April, for example, Sci Fi ranked sixth in cable networks in the 25-to-54 age group. Growth in female viewers outpaced that in men; 43 percent of Sci Fi’s viewers are female.
[...]
The network has drawn more women by making subtle tweaks to marketing and programming. In marketing materials for “Battlestar Galactica,” for example, there are no spaceships, and the story lines try to create more of a balance between action and emotion.
[...]
“There were a lot of misperceptions that Sci Fi was for men, that it was for young men and that it was for geeky young men,” said Bonnie Hammer, the president of NBC Universal Cable Entertainment, which oversees Sci Fi. “We had to broaden the channel to change the misconceptions of the genre.”
[...]

So.. all you women out there watching wrestling on the Sci Fi Channel, please stop! Maybe then they'll find room in their schedule for something decent.

When the Sci Fi Channel was first announced, I was anxiously wondering whether we'd be getting it. I mean, think of it, an entire channel devoted to shows like Star Trek and My Favorite Martian! What's not to love?

They've been a disappointment ever since.

Of course the Sci Fi Channel can show fantasy. We're used to fantasy being paired with science fiction. Of course that's going to include some horror as well. Fine. I even like a bit of the paranormal, especially if it has to do with UFOs or psychic abilities. That's often at least pseudo-science fiction, right? But.. not too much of it. Your core programming should still be science fiction if you're going to call yourself the Sci Fi Channel.

What are women watching on the Sci Fi channel? The ones I know are watching BSG and some Stargate. Me, I don't watch those. The reruns of Doctor Who (two weeks after I've already watched them is a rerun) are, of course, awesome. But, hello, those three shows are SCIENCE FICTION. You don't even have to stretch the definition very far! Space! Time Travel! Aliens! Robots!

Old shows popular with women that they could also show are Quantum Leap, Blake's 7 (which I never have seen), Highlander, Forever Knight, Beauty and the Beast, Star Trek, Alien Nation, old Doctor Who, and on and on. Some of those are fantasy titles, sure, but only a couple. The fanfic, particularly the slash fanfic, doesn't write itself, people! And there's precious few men writing it.

Instead Sci Fi Channel runs monster movies ad nauseum and hunts for ghosts. Nothing's more exciting than night vision shots of people fiddling with recording equipment.

By all means, play up the people and "emotions" of Battlestar Galactica. It can't hurt. Except when you do it badly. Which of course they do. The main photo on their BSG page shows a blond chick in a low-cut red dress center stage, a 7 to 5 male to female ratio, and apparently only one person who isn't white. Three things that'll turn me off and not much that'll turn me on, since there's no science fiction element in there! If it looks like anything, it looks like some sort of CIA or military show in an underground bunker. Not to mention The Last Supper imagery isn't doing it for me.

It's my belief that if Sci Fi is getting more female viewers, it's despite their efforts to do so and not because of them. They lucked into a show that women respond to. Not that they haven't done before. Cancelling Farscape was a brilliant move, truly. Which they reportedly did because they had too many "space" shows and were moving away from that. How's that working for you, Sci Fi?

It's just sad when Spike, the channel for MEN, has more science fiction shows I'd rather watch than this supposedly newly female-friendly channel devoted to the genre.
julieandrews: (Default)
I woke up early (for a Sunday early, for me early, for how much sleep I got early) with an idea. And I've just spent over an hour looking for something online and not finding it. Grrr!

Awhile back there was a bit of code out there that would swap the gender in a text. More than just pronouns, it'd change things like 'brother' to 'sister', etc. Now, where the heck is it?!

I must not be coming up with the right combination of keywords to find it, as I can't even find a reference to it. It's one thing if the script got taken down.. it's another thing that I can't even find old blog posts talking about it.

I did re-find the Gender Genie, which is worth a gander. It analyzes text and identifies if the writer is male or female. So I'll swap you the Gender Genie for a gender-swapping text-changing thingamabobber.
julieandrews: (Default)
In the comments, particularly on the John Scalzi post that I linked to in my previous post, some men are chiming in with a reason they don't go to the YA section of bookstores.

They feel that if they go there, they'll be seen as creepy sexual perverts or predators. They don't seem worried so much that they'll be chased out, but that people will look at them funny or think it.

I won't go so far as to say it's an invalid feeling. The media is at least partly to blame here (aren't they usually?) as you hear and see this sort of thing in the news and on crime dramas. And sitcoms don't help when they decide it's a funny situation to have a guy or guys hanging out around kids and doing creepy things that aren't intended to be creepy. Then isn't it hilarious when the mothers yell at them or the police show up?

It's probably made parents and caretakers of children hyperaware of the potential for danger. And it's also made at least some adult men hyperaware of doing something that might be seen as creepy.

But I don't see it as a valid reason to avoid the YA section of libraries and bookstores.

So let me try to alleviate some of your fears here and dispell some of the beliefs you may have about the YA section.

Firstly, YA means 'Young Adults' also called 'Teens'. You might find 9 year olds reading this sort of stuff, but it's not for young kids. It may be adjacent to or near the children's section of the bookstore or library, but it's quite likely its own section. Many stores have it separated by a row of shelves or a wall or the full distance of the store. Libraries may have it on an entirely different floor. In other words, you won't necessarily be going anywhere near where the little kids and their parents hang out.

Secondly, you're there to browse for books, aren't you? That means you'll be looking at the shelves and the displays. Why should anyone think it's creepy that you're looking at books in a place full of books?

Don't feel you need to bring a beard with you in the form of your 11-year old nephew. You're allowed to shop by yourself!

I hope you don't feel so self-conscious that you make a special effort to only go to these venues when school is in session. Or that you need to have an offhand comment ready that may or may not be true: I'm looking for something for my granddaughter.

Don't be timid about picking up a book that features a young girl on the cover, even if she has her arms wrapped around the cutest wittle pony ever. Chances are the person who'll help you check out won't even comment on it. If they do, it'll probably be to say they really like that book or they were considering reading that book or you should try such and such book which is like that book. Those are the only comments I ever recall receiving, no matter what I was buying/borrowing. And heck, some stores and libraries have self-checkout if you feel like avoiding the encounter entirely.

So walk into the YA section with pride and browse to your heart's content.

If anyone starts watching you suspiciously, rest easy. Maybe they've just decided you're a shoplifter.
julieandrews: (Default)
Here's something to buy at Wiscon:

Electric Velocipede #14:

Issue #14 will debut at Wiscon 32, May 22 - 26, 2008. Wiscon, if you didn't know, is the world's largest feminist science fiction convention. So I thought it only right to have an issue featuring all female contributors that could debut at the convention. The cover is by Lisa Snellings-Clark (see it larger here. Contributors are Lida Broadhurst, Karen Joy Fowler (who braved our Blindfold Taste Test), Erin Hoffman, Elissa Malcohn, Lisa Mantchev, Tracie McBride, Sandra McDonald, Melissa Mead, Penelope O’Shea, Jennifer Pelland, Sara Saab, Michelle Scott, Sonya Taaffe, Leslie Claire Walker, D. E. Wasden, Leslie What, Sharon E. Woods, and Erzebet YellowBoy. This is an extra-big issue at 100 pages!


http://www.electricvelocipede.com/htm/shopping.htm

More info here. Originally found via The Angry Black Woman.
julieandrews: (Default)
One thing I've been thinking about is the lack (as I perceive it) of science fiction books for tween and YA girls. It's quite possible I just haven't been reading along those lines and I'm missing out on some great offerings.

And when I say 'science fiction books for girls', I don't mean that girls can't read whatever science fiction book they want, no matter the gender of the main character or the gender of the author or the age of the so-called intended audience. I just mean where's the science fiction with girls in it?

The first thing that springs to mind is Diane Duane's Wizardry series. Some of you may cry 'That's fantasy!' And it's enough like fantasy that I won't argue too strongly against your view. But, to me, it's science fiction. The spells they create could very easily be mathematical or chemical formulas. And many of the books involve traveling to other planets or helping out aliens of one kind or another. If it lacks 'science', it's only because we haven't discovered the science and developed the technology yet. It certainly feels like science fiction.

An author I've only recently started to read is Scott Westerfeld. Of the 7 or so books I've read, I really prefer the ones with male main characters. However, he has written some science fiction books starring teenage girls, and they're not horrible. My favorite is Extras, which is fourth in the series, but if you don't mind reading them out of order, it could probably stand well enough on its own.

What else? Well, now I start thinking of examples that are fantasy, not science fiction. Or I think of short stories instead of novels. So, here's one of the latter:

I really like "Anda's Game" by Cory Doctorow. And that's a link, because you can go read it now if you want to! Or you can pick up Overclocked, which I highly recommend.

I'm scanning my list of books I've read in the past few years. There's Never Let me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro, but I don't think it's a book I would've appreciated as a kid. It's not quite my sort of book even now.

That's all I can come up with! Without delving into manga, where it's almost too easy. I'll give CLAMP's Angelic Layer as one example, but there's many, many more.

Please help me!
julieandrews: (Default)
The Angry Black Woman posted yesterday on The Feminist SF blog about submission and publishing statistics, etc. Are We Talking About Gender and Magazines AGAIN? --- Yes

Some juicy numbers about the percentages of women-written science fiction and fantasy that gets published in the magazines.
ExpandSee behind the cut for more links to more numbers! )
The numbers seem to indicate that men are published more than women, but also that men are submitting more than women.

Some have posited it's because women don't have the persistence to keep submitting to a market that rejects them once, twice, or a few times. Others that women have less time to write, what with the fulltime job and raising a family gig.

I don't feel that first suggestion applies to me, and the second most definitely does not. Yet I wouldn't count myself in the 30-40% of the submission pile, as I've only submitted twice. (I'm working on it!)

So here's some other posits ('women' here means 'most women' or 'the average woman' or 'more women than men'. It does not mean 'all women'.):

* Women have learned that short fiction markets don't pay much and they're after real money. So they're off writing novels, or they've jumped ship to better-paying markets such as romance or mystery, or even, gasp, mainstream or literary.

* To the contrary. Women don't care if they're paid for their short fiction, so they're off writing fanfic and original fic and gaining a modest readership online and in zines. For free.

* Women spend more time socializing and less time writing. If you leave a comment on this post, you're socializing!

* Women just don't write as well as men, particularly in the science fiction genre.

* Women's brains aren't wired in a way that lends itself to writing science fiction.

* Science fiction has typically excluded women, with its early lack of women as anything but sex objects or daughters who stand around asking their scientist Dad what's going on. So women didn't grow up reading and liking science fiction so much and eventually drifted to fantasy.

You might call some of the above posits silly and/or sexist, but I think they should be examined before being tossed out. I present them here for thought and discussion, not because I necessarily believe any or all of them to be true.

It's interesting to see on the Broad Universe stats page that Strange Horizons's readership survey in 2001 showed only 40% women. It's hard to find writers where even the readers don't exist. Writers are readers first.
julieandrews: (Default)
I heard a snippet of this on the news and naturally assumed it was a doctored photo or a publicity stunt or something. Not so. And in fact, it's way cooler than any m-preg fic I never read. (The 'never' is not a typo. Not an m-preg fic fan.) Also cooler than that Arnold Schwarzenegger movie.

Turns out the man is transgender, so he really is pregnant.

I recommend reading the story from Advocate.com. Third party sources are likely to get confused.

Awesome.
julieandrews: (Default)
I'm posting a lot today. This seems to be a weekend for net-surfing, which tends to generate blog entries.

I didn't realize that the Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction had entered the 21st century and set up a blog. That's good to know. I'm sad I missed The Martian Child DVD competition, but I just borrowed it from the library yesterday and watched it today! So a bit of an odd coincidence, that. Good movie, go see it. Can't tell you if it's a good story, haven't read it. I was on a David Gerrold kick just a bit ago with his Dingilliad, which is another odd coincidence, and ties into the Awards of the previous entries. But anyhow, I am diverging off topic.

Found on the aforementioned blog is a link to a Which Science Fiction Writer Are You? test. So, okay, I bit.

Maybe I saw sexism because I was expecting to see sexism before I even clicked on the test? You tell me, when it comes up with the question:

    5) Are you a total dork when dealing with the opposite sex?
  • I'm so smooth, I couldn't possibly be a science fiction writer anyway.
  • I'm happily married, so (thank god) I don't have to worry much about that sort of thing now.
  • The ladies warn each other to avoid me when I'm drunk.
  • I probably offend a lot more people than I realize I do.
  • I just avoid people as much as possible.
  • I am the opposite sex.

Answer number 3 pretty much assumes you are the 'opposite' of a 'lady'. Which I guess you could interpret to mean any number of things. But how do you read the final answer? Try telling an android that you're the opposite sex of the opposite sex and its collar will start beeping before it fries itself.

So should I be flattered that it gave me James Tiptree Jr. as my result? Or did my claiming to be the opposite sex mean my closest fit was now automatically a woman? And is the only female science fiction writer worthy of being an answer on this test the one with a male pen name?

I suspect Ursula LeGuin made the cut. Let me see if I can suss out the other possible answers.

Ah, there they are. They weren't too hard to find. My count yields 4 women out of 26 total. I think I'll leave it to you to guess who they are. Or to cheat and take a look at the possible results for yourself.

How do I think the test did at guessing who I was most like? Yea, okay, maybe given the 26 possible answers, Tiptree was the best fit.

Profile

julieandrews: (Default)
julieandrews

May 2014

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627 28293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

Expand All Cut TagsCollapse All Cut Tags