![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
On the SFWA thing
Jun. 4th, 2013 11:20 amI'm finally reading the.. I keep wanting to call it a screencap. Scan, scan. I'm finally reading the scan of the bulletin article in question.
Did anyone else notice Resnick refer to the publication he's in as "SWFA Bulletin"? And the editor didn't catch that either?
That's hardly the only error, but jeesh! Your own publication!
As for ageism, sort of.. they started it! "a group of younger writers and fans". I'm sure it wasn't just younger ones. Unless they're both 100 and therefore everyone commenting on it is younger than them.
Oh my head! There's a fake geek girl reference in here if you know where to look!
Speaking of heads, the lack of men's heads on romance covers does not even compare to the lack of women's heads on multiple genres' covers.
Also, when you say 'liberal fascists' with a straight face, my eyes glaze over.
Did anyone else notice Resnick refer to the publication he's in as "SWFA Bulletin"? And the editor didn't catch that either?
That's hardly the only error, but jeesh! Your own publication!
As for ageism, sort of.. they started it! "a group of younger writers and fans". I'm sure it wasn't just younger ones. Unless they're both 100 and therefore everyone commenting on it is younger than them.
Oh my head! There's a fake geek girl reference in here if you know where to look!
Speaking of heads, the lack of men's heads on romance covers does not even compare to the lack of women's heads on multiple genres' covers.
Also, when you say 'liberal fascists' with a straight face, my eyes glaze over.